![]() It has no problem staying on top of a ~5TB backup set once the backup completed, though. I also seeded the initial backup in stages, backing up about 500GB - 750GB or so at a time, and adding the next chunk to the backup set only after the initial chunk had backed up. I remember making tweaks to java settings - I think I increased the heap size and possibly a couple other things as well. The biggest issue with Crashplan is that their client is Java-based, and the default Java settings don't work well if your backup sets are large. I can back up 5 family PCs for ~$5 each, or just have them back up to my NAS, then pay $10 to back my NAS up, and I'm within the ToS with the Crashplan Pro plan. It was a bit of a memory hog, but now with 24GB of RAM in my NAS, I don't really care.īackblaze doesn't have a Linux client, doesn't let you back up a server, and doesn't let you back up mapped drives. Once I figured out how Docker works, it's been running without issue. ![]() ![]() A couple years ago I shifted to a QNAP NAS and now I have crashplan running in a Docker. I was running it for a few years on a Windows Home Server box. Encrypting at the client means I can't access the data from the web, but I'm OK with that.ĭitto on the CrashPlan Pro recommendation. I like that I can provide the client with a looong encryption key, and it encrypts the data on-the-fly during backups while still allowing for differential backups. 99% of the time, that VM is idling and using almost no resources. The client auto-updates itself as needed and I haven't ever had that process go wrong (yet). Been running for 3 years now with absolutely no hands-on intervention required, except every 2-3 months I log in to update Linux and reboot it. I have it running in a stripped-down Linux VM (2GB RAM, 2 "cores", 15GB disk thin-provisioned disk of which ~2GB is used) and it backs up 5TB of data across 4 ZFS volumes (shared as read-only via NFS) every night for $10/month. I've been using Crashplan Pro for years now (and the personal version before that) with no issues at all. I'm happy to invest in a proper cloud backup service, but I just figured if I already have the cloud storage, and the general means to automatically backup my computers to said cloud storage, why not just stick with what I already have, if it would work though? It's unlikely OneDrive is going to disappear as a service (it may change names), so it's a pretty good horse to bet on for longevity as far as services go. OneDrive gives me 1TB of cloud storage, of which I'm using 50GB, so plenty of room for backup images. I basically have daily snapshots of my machines captured across 4-5 backup images per computer, for my purposes that's enough. Is this effective as an off-site backup solution? Granted there's no software to look for changes to files in real-time, but I'm fine with that. I was looking into BackBlaze and Carbonite, Crashplan, and iDrive as well but now I'm thinking of just making a directory on my OneDrive account and syncing my backup images to that OD folder, so that I effectively have an off-site copy. That USB drive is my "unplug and run in case of fire". The backups are directly saved to my NAS, and I use HBS3 to sync that NAS directory of backup images to an external HDD over USB. Right now my backups are full + incremental backups with Macrium Reflect. Hope it's OK to piggyback off of this thread as I'm in a similar situation looking for a good cloud backup solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |